Karen Livadas v. Victoria Bradshaw
512 U.S. 107 · Decided June 13, 1994 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Karen Livadas v. Victoria Bradshaw was decided on June 13, 1994 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice David H. Souter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 512 U.S. 107 · 114 S. Ct. 2068 · 129 L. Ed. 2d 93 · 1994 U.S. LEXIS 4444
- Docket number
- 92-1920
- Decided
- June 13, 1994
- Argued
- April 26, 1994
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- David H. Souter
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Labor-Management Relations Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority |
Full case caption
Karen Livadas v. Victoria Bradshaw, California Labor Commissioner
SCDB identifiers: case 1993-072, docket 1993-072-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation”
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for American Diversified Savings Bank
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. County of Kent
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Myron Wolens
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc. v. G. Michael Dobson
- Freightliner Corporation v. Ben Myrick
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance Company
Cases on the same legal provision: Labor-Management Relations Act
- Local 144 Nursing Home Pension Fund v. Nicholas Demisay
- Arthur Groves v. Ring Screw Works
- Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division v. United Automobile
- United Steelworkers of America v. Rawson
- Lynn L. Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union No. 6
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. County of Kent
- American Dredging Company v. William Robert Miller
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for American Diversified Savings Bank
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Grant T. Norris
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error