Lakeside v. Oregon
435 U.S. 333 · Decided March 22, 1978 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Lakeside v. Oregon was decided on March 22, 1978 by a vote of 6–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Self-incrimination (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 435 U.S. 333 · 98 S. Ct. 1091 · 55 L. Ed. 2d 319 · 1978 U.S. LEXIS 73
- Docket number
- 76-6942
- Decided
- March 22, 1978
- Argued
- January 18, 1978
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Self-incrimination (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: William J. Brennan Jr..
Full case caption
Lakeside v. Oregon
SCDB identifiers: case 1977-055, docket 1977-055-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Self-incrimination (general)”
- United States v. Wong
- United States v. Washington
- Andresen v. Maryland
- Fisher v. United States
- United States v. Euge
- Garner v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
- Lefkowitz v. CunninghamLaw held unconstitutional
- New Jersey v. Portash
- United States v. Apfelbaum
- United States v. Nobles
- Lefkowitz v. TurleyLaw held unconstitutional
- Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Rinaldi v. United States
- Pennsylvania v. Mimms
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.
- Moore v. Illinois
- Smith v. Digmon
- Bordenkircher v. Hayes
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error