CaseTrail

Lance Raygor and James Goodchild v. Regents of the University of Minnesota

534 U.S. 533 · Decided February 27, 2002 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Lance Raygor and James Goodchild v. Regents of the University of Minnesota was decided on February 27, 2002 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Ancillary or pendent jurisdiction” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
534 U.S. 533 · 122 S. Ct. 999 · 152 L. Ed. 2d 27 · 2002 U.S. LEXIS 1375
Docket number
00-1514
Decided
February 27, 2002
Argued
November 26, 2001
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
28 U.S.C. § 1367
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Lance Raygor and James Goodchild v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2001-026, docket 2001-026-01.

Other cases on “Ancillary or pendent jurisdiction”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. § 1367

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error