CaseTrail

Maryland for the Use of Levin v. United States

382 U.S. 159 · Decided November 22, 1965 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Maryland for the Use of Levin v. United States was decided on November 22, 1965 by a vote of 6–2. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Judicial administration, miscellaneous” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
382 U.S. 159 · 86 S. Ct. 305 · 15 L. Ed. 2d 227 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 209
Docket number
345
Decided
November 22, 1965
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–2
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Rehearing or restored to calendar for reargument
Issue area
Judicial Power
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackMajority
Justice William O. DouglasMajority
Justice Tom C. ClarkDissentCo-authored an opinion
Chief Justice Earl WarrenMajority
Justice John M. Harlan IIDissentCo-authored an opinion
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Majority
Justice Potter StewartMajority
Justice Byron R. WhiteMajority

Did not participate: Abe Fortas.

Full case caption

Maryland for the Use of Levin et al. v. United States

SCDB identifiers: case 1965-018, docket 1965-018-01.

Other cases on “Judicial administration, miscellaneous”

See all

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error