Mathews v. Eldridge
424 U.S. 319 · Decided February 24, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Mathews v. Eldridge was decided on February 24, 1976 by a vote of 6–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Poverty law, constitutional” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 424 U.S. 319 · 96 S. Ct. 893 · 47 L. Ed. 2d 18 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 141
- Docket number
- 74-204
- Decided
- February 24, 1976
- Argued
- October 6, 1975
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Poverty law, constitutional
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Did not participate: John Paul Stevens.
Full case caption
Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Eldridge
SCDB identifiers: case 1975-035, docket 1975-035-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Poverty law, constitutional”
- Lavine v. Milne
- Weinberger v. Salfi
- Knebel v. Hein
- Califano v. Jobst
- Idaho Department of Employment v. Smith
- Zablocki v. RedhailLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (due process)
- United States v. Powell
- Mathews v. Diaz
- Hampton v. Mow Sun WongLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Agurs
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.
- Moody v. Daggett
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Turner v. Department of Employment Security of UtahLaw held unconstitutional
- De Canas v. Bica
- Fisher v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of Montana
- Imbler v. Pachtman
- Lavine v. Milne
- East Carroll Parish School Board v. Marshall
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error