McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.
357 U.S. 265 · Decided June 23, 1958 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. was decided on June 23, 1958 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Military, veterans” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 357 U.S. 265 · 78 S. Ct. 1222 · 2 L. Ed. 2d 1305 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1842
- Docket number
- 93
- Decided
- June 23, 1958
- Argued
- January 27, 1958
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Felix Frankfurter
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Military, veterans
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Selective Service statutes
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority |
Full case caption
McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1957-130, docket 1957-130-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Military, veterans”
- United States v. Plesha
- United States ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesLaw held unconstitutional
- Bell v. United States
- United States v. Oregon
- United States v. Shimer
- Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Selective Service statutes
- Gonzales v. United States
- Johnston v. United States
- Witmer v. United States
- Sicurella v. United States
- Simmons v. United States
- Gonzales v. United States
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Heikkinen v. United States
- Harmon v. Brucker
- Marshall v. Brucker
- Perez v. Brownell
- Trop v. DullesLaw held unconstitutional
- Nishikawa v. Dulles
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error