CaseTrail

Michael J. Astrue v. Catherine G. Ratliff

560 U.S. 586 · Decided June 14, 2010 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Michael J. Astrue v. Catherine G. Ratliff was decided on June 14, 2010 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses” in the Attorneys area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
560 U.S. 586 · 130 S. Ct. 2521 · 177 L. Ed. 2d 91 · 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4763
Docket number
08-1322
Decided
June 14, 2010
Argued
February 22, 2010
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Clarence Thomas
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
Equal Access to Justice Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security v. Catherine G. Ratliff

SCDB identifiers: case 2009-069, docket 2009-069-01.

Other cases on “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Equal Access to Justice Act

Same Term, same area (Attorneys)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error