Mrvica v. Esperdy
376 U.S. 560 · Decided March 30, 1964 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Mrvica v. Esperdy was decided on March 30, 1964 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John M. Harlan II wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Immigration, permanent residence” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 376 U.S. 560 · 84 S. Ct. 833 · 11 L. Ed. 2d 911 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1534
- Docket number
- 353
- Decided
- March 30, 1964
- Argued
- March 5, 1964
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- John M. Harlan II
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Immigration, permanent residence
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Immigration and Nationality statutes
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Mrvica v. Esperdy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
SCDB identifiers: case 1963-089, docket 1963-089-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Immigration, permanent residence”
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Bagamasbad
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Miranda
- Alberto R. Gonzales v. Michelle Thomas
- Panagis Vartelas v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
- Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio
- United States v. Texas
Cases on the same legal provision: Immigration and Nationality statutes
- Costello v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Schneider v. RuskAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Marks v. Esperdy
- Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Rosenberg v. Fleuti
- Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Shockey v. Illinois
- Ausbie v. California
- Daegele v. Kansas
- Herrear v. Heinze
- Tabb v. California
- Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error