Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg
476 U.S. 953 · Decided June 16, 1986 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg was decided on June 16, 1986 unanimously (7–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 476 U.S. 953 · 106 S. Ct. 2349 · 90 L. Ed. 2d 943 · 1986 U.S. LEXIS 61
- Docket number
- 85-568
- Decided
- June 16, 1986
- Argued
- April 21, 1986
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr., John Paul Stevens.
Full case caption
Nantahala Power & Light Co. et al. v. Thornburg, Attorney General of North Carolina, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1985-113, docket 1985-113-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation”
- Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.
- Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
- Public Service Commission of Maryland v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Company of Maryland
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
- Exxon Corp. v. Hunt
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi ex Rel. Moore
- Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians
- Arcadia v. Ohio Power Company
- Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp.
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Federal Power Commission
- Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power Commission
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. State Oil and Gas Board of Mississippi
- United States v. Maine
- Wisconsin Department of Industry v. Gould Inc.
- Exxon Corp. v. Hunt
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
- Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error