National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
468 U.S. 85 · Decided June 27, 1984 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma was decided on June 27, 1984 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 468 U.S. 85 · 104 S. Ct. 2948 · 82 L. Ed. 2d 70 · 1984 U.S. LEXIS 130
- Docket number
- 83-271
- Decided
- June 27, 1984
- Argued
- March 20, 1984
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1983-146, docket 1983-146-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Altered precedent
- Hoover v. Ronwin
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
- Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
- Local Union No. 189 v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
- United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Lexington
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia
- Secretary of the Interior v. California
- Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. Fox
- Southland Corp. v. Keating
- Dixson v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error