National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
522 U.S. 479 · Decided February 25, 1998 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co. was decided on February 25, 1998 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Consumer protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 522 U.S. 479 · 118 S. Ct. 927 · 140 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 1998 U.S. LEXIS 1448
- Docket number
- 96-843
- Decided
- February 25, 1998
- Argued
- October 6, 1997
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Consumer protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- 12 U.S.C. § 1759
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Dissent | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent |
Full case caption
National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1997-030, docket 1997-030-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Consumer protection”
- David R. Beach v. Ocwen Federal Bank
- Food and Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
- George W. Heintz v. Darlene Jenkins
- TRW Inc. v. Adelaide Andrews
- Household Credit Services, Inc. and Mbna America Bank, N. A. v. Sharon R. Pfennig
- Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Bradley Nigh
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- State Oil Company v. Barkat U. Khan and Khan & Associates, Inc.Altered precedent
- Bay Area Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corporation of California, Inc.
- Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. Richard V Fink
- Christopher H. Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals TribunalLaw held unconstitutional
- Newsweek, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue
- Daniel Bogan and Marilyn Roderick v. Janet Scott-Harris
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error