Nc Bd. of Dental Examiners v. FTC
574 U.S. 494 · Decided February 25, 2015 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Nc Bd. of Dental Examiners v. FTC was decided on February 25, 2015 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 574 U.S. 494 · 135 S. Ct. 1101 · 191 L. Ed. 2d 35 · 2015 U.S. LEXIS 1502
- Docket number
- 13-534
- Decided
- February 25, 2015
- Argued
- October 14, 2014
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
Nc Bd. of Dental Examiners v. FTC
SCDB identifiers: case 2014-008, docket 2014-008-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc.
- Ohio v. American Express Co.
- Apple Inc. v. Pepper
- American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League
- Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co. LLC
- Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Linkline Communications, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
- Local Union No. 189 v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
- T Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell
- Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
- Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank
- M&g Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett
- Direct Mktg. Ass'n v. Brohl
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error