CaseTrail

Paul Renico v. Reginald Lett

559 U.S. 766 · Decided May 3, 2010 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Paul Renico v. Reginald Lett was decided on May 3, 2010 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Habeas corpus” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
559 U.S. 766 · 130 S. Ct. 1855 · 176 L. Ed. 2d 678 · 2010 U.S. LEXIS 3675
Docket number
09-338
Decided
May 3, 2010
Argued
March 29, 2010
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
John G. Roberts Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Habeas corpus
Legal provision
28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2255 (habeas corpus)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Paul Renico, Warden v. Reginald Lett

SCDB identifiers: case 2009-040, docket 2009-040-01.

Other cases on “Habeas corpus”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2255 (habeas corpus)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error