Paul Schenck and Dwight Saunders v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York
519 U.S. 357 · Decided February 19, 1997 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Paul Schenck and Dwight Saunders v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York was decided on February 19, 1997 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part, reversed or vacated it in part, and remanded the case. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Abortion and contraceptives” in the Privacy area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 519 U.S. 357 · 117 S. Ct. 855 · 137 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 1270
- Docket number
- 95-1065
- Decided
- February 19, 1997
- Argued
- October 16, 1996
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Abortion and contraceptives
- Issue area
- Privacy
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Dissent | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Paul Schenck and Dwight Saunders v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1996-024, docket 1996-024-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Abortion and contraceptives”
- Martin D. Lambert v. Susan Wicklund
- Joseph P. Mazurek v. James H. Armstrong
- Michael O. Leavitt v. Jane L.
- Judy Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.
- National Organization for Women, Inc., Etc. v. Joseph Scheidler
- Leila Jeanne Hill v. Colorado
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Dan Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc.
- Janet Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionLaw held unconstitutional
- Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Umbehr
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. and Peoples Super Liquor Stores, Inc. v. Rhode Island and Rhode Island Liquor Stores AssociationAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Ralph P. Forbes
- National Endowment for the Arts v. Karen Finley
Same Term, same area (Privacy)
- D. Dean Bibles v. Oregon Natural Desert Association
- Martin D. Lambert v. Susan Wicklund
- Walker L. Chandler v. Zell D. MillerLaw held unconstitutional
- Joseph P. Mazurek v. James H. Armstrong
- Washington v. Harold Glucksberg
- Dennis C. Vacco v. Timothy E. Quill
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error