Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Rychlik
352 U.S. 480 · Decided February 25, 1957 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Rychlik was decided on February 25, 1957 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John M. Harlan II wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Union or closed shop” in the Unions area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 352 U.S. 480 · 77 S. Ct. 421 · 1 L. Ed. 2d 480 · 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1643
- Docket number
- 56
- Decided
- February 25, 1957
- Argued
- December 10, 1956
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John M. Harlan II
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Union or closed shop
- Issue area
- Unions
- Legal provision
- Railway Labor Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority |
Did not participate: Hugo L. Black.
Full case caption
Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al. v. Rychlik
SCDB identifiers: case 1956-044, docket 1956-044-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Union or closed shop”
- Railway Employes' Department v. Hanson
- Felter v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Local Lodge No. 1424 v. National Labor Relations Board
- System Federation No. 91 v. Wright
- Local Union No. 10 v. Graham
- Local 60 v. National Labor Relations Board
Cases on the same legal provision: Railway Labor Act
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad Co.
- California v. Taylor
- Conleyv. Gibson
- Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Day
- Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Price
- Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Koppal
Same Term, same area (Unions)
- National Labor Relations Board v. Lion Oil Co.
- Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board.
- Mitchell v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad Co.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449
- Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, S. A.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error