CaseTrail

Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School District

361 U.S. 376 · Decided February 23, 1960 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School District was decided on February 23, 1960 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “National supremacy, state tax” in the Federalism area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
361 U.S. 376 · 80 S. Ct. 474 · 4 L. Ed. 2d 384 · 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1600
Docket number
40
Decided
February 23, 1960
Argued
November 17, 1959
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Earl Warren
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Appeal
Issue area
Federalism
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School District

SCDB identifiers: case 1959-030, docket 1959-030-01.

Other cases on “National supremacy, state tax”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)

Same Term, same area (Federalism)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error