Preiser v. Newkirk
422 U.S. 395 · Decided June 25, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Preiser v. Newkirk was decided on June 25, 1975 by a vote of 8–1. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Mootness” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 422 U.S. 395 · 95 S. Ct. 2330 · 45 L. Ed. 2d 272 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 75
- Docket number
- 74-107
- Decided
- June 25, 1975
- Argued
- January 20, 1975
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Mootness
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Preiser, Commissioner of Correctional Services of New York, et al. v. Newkirk
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-137, docket 1974-137-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Mootness”
- Edwards v. Healy
- United States v. New Jersey State Lottery Commission
- Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis v. Jacobs
- Weinstein v. Bradford
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle
- Patterson v. Warner
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization
- New Hampshire v. Maine
- Singleton v. Wulff
- Vermont v. New York
- Defunis v. Odegaard
- Steffel v. Thompson
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- United States v. Michigan National Corp.
- Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit Union
- Fusari v. Steinberg
- Harris County Commissioners Court v. Moore
- Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis v. Jacobs
- Lee v. Thornton
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error