Pugach v. Dollinger
365 U.S. 458 · Decided February 27, 1961 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Pugach v. Dollinger was decided on February 27, 1961 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 365 U.S. 458 · 81 S. Ct. 650 · 5 L. Ed. 2d 678 · 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1650
- Docket number
- 111
- Decided
- February 27, 1961
- Argued
- January 16, 1961
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Opinion assigned by
- Hugo L. Black
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Search and seizure (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Communications Act of 1934
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Full case caption
Pugach v. Dollinger, District Attorney of Bronx County, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1960-054, docket 1960-054-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”
- Wilson v. Schnettler
- Silverman v. United States
- Chapman v. United States
- Mapp v. OhioAltered precedent
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property at 104 East Tenth StreetLaw held unconstitutional
- Elkins v. United StatesAltered precedent
Cases on the same legal provision: Communications Act of 1934
- Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America v. Wday, Inc.
- United States v. Radio Corporation of America
- Federal Communications Commission v. Schreiber
- United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.
- Federal Communications Commission v. Allentown Broadcasting Corp.
- United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Scott v. California
- Reina v. United States
- Callanan v. United States
- Carbo v. United States
- Campbell v. United States
- McNeal v. Culver
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error