Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.
442 U.S. 330 · Decided June 11, 1979 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Reiter v. Sonotone Corp. was decided on June 11, 1979 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 442 U.S. 330 · 99 S. Ct. 2326 · 60 L. Ed. 2d 931 · 1979 U.S. LEXIS 108
- Docket number
- 78-690
- Decided
- June 11, 1979
- Argued
- April 25, 1979
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Did not participate: William J. Brennan Jr..
Full case caption
Reiter v. Sonotone Corp. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1978-116, docket 1978-116-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
- Group Life & Health Insurance Co. v. Royal Drug Co., Inc.
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
- McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- Illinois v. Abbott & Associates, Inc.
- United States v. American Building Maintenance Industries
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.
- United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.
- United States v. Connecticut National Bank
- United States v. General Dynamics Corp.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. First Lincolnwood Corp.
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co.
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Daniel
- Director v. Rasmussen
- Butner v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error