CaseTrail

Republic of Austria v. Altmann

541 U.S. 677 · Decided June 7, 2004 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Republic of Austria v. Altmann was decided on June 7, 2004 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Retroactivity of new rights” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
541 U.S. 677 · 124 S. Ct. 2240 · 159 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4030
Docket number
03-13
Decided
June 7, 2004
Argued
February 25, 2004
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
John Paul Stevens
Opinion assigned by
John Paul Stevens
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
28 U.S.C. § 1605
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Chief Justice William H. RehnquistDissent
Justice John Paul StevensMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorMajority
Justice Antonin ScaliaConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Anthony M. KennedyDissentWrote an opinion
Justice David H. SouterConcurrence
Justice Clarence ThomasDissent
Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgMajority
Justice Stephen G. BreyerConcurrenceWrote an opinion

Full case caption

Republic of Austria et al. v. Altmann

SCDB identifiers: case 2003-065, docket 2003-065-01.

Other cases on “Retroactivity of new rights”

See all

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error