Ricky Bell v. Gregory Thompson
545 U.S. 794 · Decided June 27, 2005 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Ricky Bell v. Gregory Thompson was decided on June 27, 2005 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jurisdiction of federal courts of appeals” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 545 U.S. 794 · 125 S. Ct. 2825 · 162 L. Ed. 2d 693 · 2005 U.S. LEXIS 5213
- Docket number
- 04-514
- Decided
- June 27, 2005
- Argued
- April 26, 2005
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Jurisdiction of federal courts of appeals
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Dissent | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Ricky Bell, Warden v. Gregory Thompson
SCDB identifiers: case 2004-077, docket 2004-077-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Jurisdiction of federal courts of appeals”
- Carl Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust
- Helen Purcell v. Maria M. Gonzalez
- Pat Osborn v. Barry Haley
- Khanh Phuong Nguyen v. United States
- Dow Chemical Company v. Daniel Raymond Stephenson
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Hurley Henson
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Gonzalez v. Crosby
- Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.
- William Erickson v. Barry J. Pardus
- Keith Bowles v. Harry RussellAltered precedent
- Abu-Ali Abdur'rahman v. Ricky Bell
- Philippines v. Pimentel
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- John F. Kowalski v. John C. Tesmer
- Marlon Latodd Howell v. Mississippi
- Ricky Bell v. Gary Bradford Cone
- Claude M. Ballard v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- Robert Johnson, Jr. v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error