CaseTrail

Scott Leslie Carmell v. Texas

529 U.S. 513 · Decided May 1, 2000 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Scott Leslie Carmell v. Texas was decided on May 1, 2000 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Miscellaneous criminal procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
529 U.S. 513 · 120 S. Ct. 1620 · 146 L. Ed. 2d 577 · 2000 U.S. LEXIS 3004
Docket number
98-7540
Decided
May 1, 2000
Argued
November 30, 1999
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
John Paul Stevens
Opinion assigned by
John Paul Stevens
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Article I, Section 10 (state bill of attainder or ex post facto law)
Type of law
Constitution
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Scott Leslie Carmell v. Texas

SCDB identifiers: case 1999-055, docket 1999-055-01.

Other cases on “Miscellaneous criminal procedure”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 10 (state bill of attainder or ex post facto law)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error