Scott Leslie Carmell v. Texas
529 U.S. 513 · Decided May 1, 2000 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Scott Leslie Carmell v. Texas was decided on May 1, 2000 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Miscellaneous criminal procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 529 U.S. 513 · 120 S. Ct. 1620 · 146 L. Ed. 2d 577 · 2000 U.S. LEXIS 3004
- Docket number
- 98-7540
- Decided
- May 1, 2000
- Argued
- November 30, 1999
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Miscellaneous criminal procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 10 (state bill of attainder or ex post facto law)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Dissent | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Scott Leslie Carmell v. Texas
SCDB identifiers: case 1999-055, docket 1999-055-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Miscellaneous criminal procedure”
- Charles B. Miller v. Richard A. French
- District of Columbia v. HellerLaw held unconstitutional
- Otis McDonald v. City of ChicagoAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. MillerAltered precedent
- Patrick Ramirez v. Indiana
- Waller v. Georgia
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 10 (state bill of attainder or ex post facto law)
- J. Wayne Garner v. Robert L. Jones
- Mark Seling v. Andre Brigham Young
- Delbert W. Smith and Bruce M. Botelho v. John Doe I
- Marion Reynolds Stogner v. CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Kenneth Lynce v. Hamilton MathisLaw held unconstitutional
- California Department of Corrections v. Jose Ramon Morales
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- James Michael Flippo v. West Virginia
- New York v. Michael Hill
- Illinois v. William aka Sam Wardlow
- Salvador Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California
- Lonnie Weeks, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone
- United States v. Abel Martinez-Salazar
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error