Stanley v. Illinois
405 U.S. 645 · Decided April 3, 1972 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Stanley v. Illinois was decided on April 3, 1972 by a vote of 5–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 405 U.S. 645 · 92 S. Ct. 1208 · 31 L. Ed. 2d 551 · 1972 U.S. LEXIS 70
- Docket number
- 70-5014
- Decided
- April 3, 1972
- Argued
- October 19, 1971
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–2
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- William O. Douglas
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Sex discrimination (excluding employment)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr., William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Stanley v. Illinois
SCDB identifiers: case 1971-087, docket 1971-087-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)”
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Frontiero et Vir v. RichardsonLaw held unconstitutional
- Kahn v. Shevin
- Schlesinger v. Ballard
- Taylor v. LouisianaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Loper v. Beto
- Rabe v. Washington
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleLaw held unconstitutional
- Smith v. Florida
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. v. Frick Co.
- Swarb v. Lennox
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Engelman v. Amos
- Doherty v. United States
- Schreiner v. United States
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Belcher
- Mayer v. City of Chicago
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error