Talley v. California
362 U.S. 60 · Decided March 7, 1960 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Talley v. California was decided on March 7, 1960 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “First Amendment, miscellaneous” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared a municipal or other local ordinance unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 362 U.S. 60 · 80 S. Ct. 536 · 4 L. Ed. 2d 559 · 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1948
- Docket number
- 154
- Decided
- March 7, 1960
- Argued
- January 13, 1960
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Hugo L. Black
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- First Amendment, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A municipal or other local ordinance
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Dissent | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Full case caption
Talley v. California
SCDB identifiers: case 1959-043, docket 1959-043-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “First Amendment, miscellaneous”
- Bates v. City of Little RockLaw held unconstitutional
- In re Sawyer
- Shelton v. TuckerLaw held unconstitutional
- Times Film Corp. v. City of Chicago
- Louisiana ex Rel. Gremillion v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored PeopleLaw held unconstitutional
- Lathrop v. Donohue
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Smith v. CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. Regents of the University of the State of New YorkLaw held unconstitutional
- Speiser v. RandallLaw held unconstitutional
- First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los AngelesLaw held unconstitutional
- First Methodist Church of San Leandro v. Horstmann
- Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Smith v. CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Bates v. City of Little RockLaw held unconstitutional
- Nelson v. County of Los Angeles
- Nostrand v. Little
- Kreshik v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church of North America
- Flemming v. Nestor
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error