Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.
365 U.S. 320 · Decided February 27, 1961 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co. was decided on February 27, 1961 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 365 U.S. 320 · 81 S. Ct. 623 · 5 L. Ed. 2d 580 · 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1959
- Docket number
- 87
- Decided
- February 27, 1961
- Argued
- December 15, 1960
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Full case caption
Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1960-048, docket 1960-048-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.
- United States v. Parke
- Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
- Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc. v. United States
- Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
- United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
- Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
- United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Dugan & McNamara, Inc.
- New York v. Henagan
- Thomas v. Virginia
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.
- Lewis v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error