Tison v. Arizona
481 U.S. 137 · Decided April 21, 1987 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Tison v. Arizona was decided on April 21, 1987 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 481 U.S. 137 · 107 S. Ct. 1676 · 95 L. Ed. 2d 127 · 1987 U.S. LEXIS 1808
- Docket number
- 84-6075
- Decided
- April 21, 1987
- Argued
- November 3, 1986
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority |
Full case caption
Tison v. Arizona
SCDB identifiers: case 1986-072, docket 1986-072-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty”
- McCleskey v. Kemp
- Hitchcock v. Dugger
- Booth v. MarylandLaw held unconstitutional
- Sumner v. ShumanLaw held unconstitutional
- Lowenfield v. Phelps
- Ford v. Wainwright
Cases on the same legal provision: Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment)
- California v. Brown
- Whitley v. Albers
- Murray v. Giarratano
- Solem v. Helm
- Pearly L. Wilson v. Richard Seiter
- Ronald Allen Harmelin v. Michigan
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Colorado v. Connelly
- Griffith v. Kentucky
- Colorado v. Bertine
- Connecticut v. Barrett
- California v. Brown
- Colorado v. Spring
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error