Tommy G. Thompson v. Western States Medical Center
535 U.S. 357 · Decided April 29, 2002 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Tommy G. Thompson v. Western States Medical Center was decided on April 29, 2002 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, excluding attorneys” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 535 U.S. 357 · 122 S. Ct. 1497 · 152 L. Ed. 2d 563 · 2002 U.S. LEXIS 3035
- Docket number
- 01-344
- Decided
- April 29, 2002
- Argued
- February 26, 2002
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Commercial speech, excluding attorneys
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- An act of Congress
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Western States Medical Center et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2001-041, docket 2001-041-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Commercial speech, excluding attorneys”
- United States and Department of Agriculture v. United Foods, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corporation
- Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Association, Inc., Etc. v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
- Mike Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association
- Dan Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc.
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. and Peoples Super Liquor Stores, Inc. v. Rhode Island and Rhode Island Liquor Stores AssociationAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.
- Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of StrattonLaw held unconstitutional
- Be & K Construction Company v. National Labor Relations Board
- Republican Party of Minnesota v. Suzanne White
- Caren Cronk Thomas and Windy City Hemp Development Board v. Chicago Park District
- Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Caren Cronk Thomas and Windy City Hemp Development Board v. Chicago Park District
- John D. Ashcroft v. the Free Speech CoalitionLaw held unconstitutional
- City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.
- John Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union
- Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of StrattonLaw held unconstitutional
- Susan Tave Zelman v. Doris Simmons-Harris
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error