United States v. National City Lines, Inc.
334 U.S. 573 · Decided June 7, 1948 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. National City Lines, Inc. was decided on June 7, 1948 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Wiley B. Rutledge wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Venue” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 334 U.S. 573 · 68 S. Ct. 1169 · 92 L. Ed. 2d 1584 · 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2812
- Docket number
- 544
- Decided
- June 7, 1948
- Argued
- April 28, 1948
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Wiley B. Rutledge
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Venue
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. National City Lines, Inc. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1947-099, docket 1947-099-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Venue”
- Suttle v. Reich Bros. Construction Co.
- Hoiness v. United States
- Ex Parte Collett
- Kilpatrick v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Flowers
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- United States v. Scophony Corporation of America
- Standard Oil Company of California v. United States
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.
- Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.
- Moore v. Mead's Fine Bread Co.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Williams v. Fanning
- Globe Liquor Co., Inc. v. San Roman
- Musser v. Utah
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.
- King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America
- Suttle v. Reich Bros. Construction Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error