United States v. Pacific Coast Wholesalers' Association
338 U.S. 689 · Decided February 6, 1950 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
United States v. Pacific Coast Wholesalers' Association was decided on February 6, 1950 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Truck or motor carrier regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 338 U.S. 689 · 70 S. Ct. 411 · 94 L. Ed. 2d 474 · 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2493
- Docket number
- 113
- Decided
- February 6, 1950
- Argued
- January 10, 1950
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Truck or motor carrier regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Interstate Commerce Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Justice Sherman Minton | Majority |
Did not participate: William O. Douglas.
Full case caption
United States et al. v. Pacific Coast Wholesalers' Association et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1949-044, docket 1949-044-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Truck or motor carrier regulation”
- United States v. Capital Transit Company
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States
- United States v. Contract Steel Carriers, Inc.
- East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Frozen Food Express
- Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act
- Reider v. Thompson
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.
- Henderson v. United States
- United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission
- Chicago v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- United States v. Spelar
- Treichler v. WisconsinLaw held unconstitutional
- Faulkner v. Gibbs
- Reilly v. Pinkus
- United States v. Capital Transit Company
- Brown v. Western Railway of Alabama
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error