Warger v. Shauers
574 U.S. 40 · Decided December 9, 2014 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Warger v. Shauers was decided on December 9, 2014 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Extra-legal jury influences, voir dire” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 574 U.S. 40 · 135 S. Ct. 521 · 190 L. Ed. 2d 422 · 2014 U.S. LEXIS 8294
- Docket number
- 13-517
- Decided
- December 9, 2014
- Argued
- October 8, 2014
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Extra-legal jury influences, voir dire
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Evidence
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
Warger v. Shauers
SCDB identifiers: case 2014-006, docket 2014-006-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Extra-legal jury influences, voir dire”
- Mary Berghuis v. Diapolis Smith
- Rick Thaler v. Anthony Cardell Haynes
- Eric Presley v. Georgia
- Michael Rivera v. Illinois
- Pitchford v. Cain
- Dawud Majid Mu'min v. Virginia
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Evidence
- Sprint/united Management Company v. Ellen Mendelsohn
- Diaz v. United States
- Maria Suzuki Ohler v. United States
- General Electric Company v. Robert K. Joiner et Ux.
- Johnny Lynn Old Chief v. United States
- Carrie Jaffee v. Mary Lu Redmond
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Raul Lopez v. Marvin Vernis Smith
- Heien v. North Carolina
- Whitfield v. United States
- Jennings v. Stephens
- Yates v. United States
- Grady v. North Carolina
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error