Weyerhaeuser Company v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
139 S. Ct. 361 · Decided November 27, 2018 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Weyerhaeuser Company v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was decided on November 27, 2018 unanimously (8–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2018
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 17-71
Case details
- Citations
- 139 S. Ct. 361 · 202 L. Ed. 2d 269 · 2018 U.S. LEXIS 6932
- Docket number
- 17-71
- Decided
- November 27, 2018
- Argued
- October 1, 2018
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Endangered Species Act 16 USC 1533
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority |
Did not participate: Brett M. Kavanaugh.
Full case caption
Weyerhaeuser Company v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
SCDB identifiers: case 2018-002, docket 2018-002-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- Sturgeon v. Frost
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian
- County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund
- U.S. Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association
- Guam v. United States
- United States Army Corp of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Escondido v. Emmons
- Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.
- Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
- Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com
- Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc.
- Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error