Whitmore v. Arkansas
495 U.S. 149 · Decided April 24, 1990 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Whitmore v. Arkansas was decided on April 24, 1990 by a vote of 7–2. SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Standing, personal injury” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 495 U.S. 149 · 110 S. Ct. 1717 · 109 L. Ed. 2d 135 · 1990 U.S. LEXIS 2182
- Docket number
- 88-7146
- Decided
- April 24, 1990
- Argued
- January 10, 1990
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Standing, personal injury
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Full case caption
Whitmore, Individually and as Next Friend of Simmons v. Arkansas et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1989-069, docket 1989-069-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Standing, personal injury”
- Demosthenes v. Baal
- Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation
- State of Wyoming v. State of OklahomaLaw held unconstitutional
- Karcher v. May
- International Union v. Brock
- Diamond v. Charles
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- United States Department of Labor v. Triplett
- United States v. Montalvo-Murillo
- Washington v. Walter Harper
- Holland v. Illinois
- Fw/pbs, Inc. v. City of DallasLaw held unconstitutional
- Franchise Tax Board of California v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- James M. White, Etc. v. United States
- Pavelic & Leflore v. Marvel Entertainment Group
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Richard Sperling
- Spallone v. United States
- Franchise Tax Board of California v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.
- W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co., Inc. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp.Altered precedent
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error