William Arthur Kelly v. South Carolina
534 U.S. 246 · Decided January 9, 2002 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
William Arthur Kelly v. South Carolina was decided on January 9, 2002 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice David H. Souter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Extra-legal jury influences, jury instructions” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 534 U.S. 246 · 122 S. Ct. 726 · 151 L. Ed. 2d 670 · 2002 U.S. LEXIS 402
- Docket number
- 00-9280
- Decided
- January 9, 2002
- Argued
- November 26, 2001
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- David H. Souter
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Extra-legal jury influences, jury instructions
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Dissent | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
William Arthur Kelly v. South Carolina
SCDB identifiers: case 2001-014, docket 2001-014-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Extra-legal jury influences, jury instructions”
- Wesley Aaron Shafer, Jr. v. South Carolina
- Raymond L. Middleton v. Sally Marie McNeil
- Ellis E. Neder, Jr. v. United States
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States
- Anthony Hedgpeth v. Michael Robert Pulido
- Doug Waddington v. Cesar Sarausad
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Kansas v. Michael T. Crane
- Wilbert K. Rogers v. Tennessee
- Arthur S. Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association
- William Fiore v. Gregory White
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. John Doe
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- United States v. Mark James Knights
- United States v. Ralph Arvizu
- United States v. Alphonso Vonn
- Walter Mickens, Jr. v. John Taylor
- United States v. Leonard CottonAltered precedent
- Alabama v. Lereed Shelton
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error