Andrus v. Texas
140 S. Ct. 1875 · Decided June 15, 2020 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Andrus v. Texas was decided on June 15, 2020 by a vote of 6–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indigents, inadequate representation by counsel” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2019
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 18-9674
Case details
- Citations
- 140 S. Ct. 1875 · 207 L. Ed. 2d 335 · 2020 U.S. LEXIS 3250
- Docket number
- 18-9674
- Decided
- June 15, 2020
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Indigents, inadequate representation by counsel
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Dissent | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Full case caption
Andrus v. Texas
SCDB identifiers: case 2019-069, docket 2019-069-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Indigents, inadequate representation by counsel”
- Weaver v. Massachusetts
- Woods v. Donald
- Christeson v. Roper
- Ryan v. Schad
- Carlos Trevino v. Rick Thaler
- Blaine Lafler v. Anthony Cooper
Cases on the same legal provision: Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
- Garza v. Idaho
- McCoy v. Louisiana
- Lee v. United States
- Buck v. Davis
- Thornell v. Jones
- United States v. Bryant
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Monasky v. Taglieri
- Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African American-Owned Media
- Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr
- Babb v. Wilkie
- Barton v. Barr
- Nasrallah v. Barr
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error