Indigents, inadequate representation by counsel: Supreme Court decisions
Every U.S. Supreme Court decision from the 1946 through 2025 Terms that the Supreme Court Database classifies under the issue “Indigents, inadequate representation by counsel,” part of the Civil Rights area.
22decisions
86%favorable to the petitioner
32%unanimous
0altered precedent or struck a law
Decisions by decade
Most majority opinions
Legal provisions most often involved
All 22 decisions, newest first
- Andrus v. Texas
- Weaver v. Massachusetts
- Woods v. Donald
- Christeson v. Roper
- Ryan v. Schad
- Carlos Trevino v. Rick Thaler
- Blaine Lafler v. Anthony Cooper
- Missouri v. Galin E. Frye
- Luis Mariano Martinez v. Charles L. Ryan
- James Walker v. Charles W. Martin
- Jeff Premo v. Randy Joseph Moore
- Albert Holland v. Florida
- Robert Wong v. Fernando Belmontes, Jr.
- David Bobby v. Robert J. Van Hook
- Michael A. Knowles v. Alexandre Mirzayance
- Penson v. Ohio
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
- Strickland v. Washington
- Wood v. Georgia
- Wilkins v. United States
- Holloway v. Arkansas
- Johnson v. Avery
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error