Armco Inc. v. Hardesty
467 U.S. 638 · Decided June 12, 1984 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Armco Inc. v. Hardesty was decided on June 12, 1984 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 467 U.S. 638 · 104 S. Ct. 2620 · 81 L. Ed. 2d 540 · 1984 U.S. LEXIS 110
- Docket number
- 83-297
- Decided
- June 12, 1984
- Argued
- April 17, 1984
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Armco Inc. v. Hardesty, Tax Commissioner of West Virginia
SCDB identifiers: case 1983-126, docket 1983-126-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasLaw held unconstitutional
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. TullyLaw held unconstitutional
- Limbach v. Hooven & Allison Co.Altered precedent
- First National Bank of Atlanta v. Bartow County Board of Tax Assessors
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. WardLaw held unconstitutional
- Kenneth Cory v. Western Oil and Gas Association
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wyoming
- White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc.
- Sporhase v. Nebraska ex Rel. DouglasAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Law held unconstitutional
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia
- Secretary of the Interior v. California
- Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. Fox
- Southland Corp. v. Keating
- Dixson v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error