Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority
476 U.S. 573 · Decided June 3, 1986 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority was decided on June 3, 1986 by a vote of 5–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 476 U.S. 573 · 106 S. Ct. 2080 · 90 L. Ed. 2d 552 · 1986 U.S. LEXIS 85
- Docket number
- 84-2030
- Decided
- June 3, 1986
- Argued
- March 3, 1986
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Did not participate: William J. Brennan Jr..
Full case caption
Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority
SCDB identifiers: case 1985-099, docket 1985-099-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- Maine v. Taylor
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corporation of America
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas
- Healy v. the Beer InstituteAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc.
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State Department of RevenueAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. ScheinerLaw held unconstitutional
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasLaw held unconstitutional
- D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd. v. McNamara
- Armco Inc. v. HardestyLaw held unconstitutional
- New Energy Company of Indiana v. LimbachLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.
- Cleavinger v. Saxner
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
- Fisher v. City of Berkeley
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD v. Zenith Radio Corp.
- Dennison Manufacturing Co. v. Panduit Corp.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error