Maine v. Taylor
477 U.S. 131 · Decided June 24, 1986 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Maine v. Taylor was decided on June 24, 1986 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 477 U.S. 131 · 106 S. Ct. 2440 · 91 L. Ed. 2d 110 · 1986 U.S. LEXIS 111
- Docket number
- 85-62
- Decided
- June 24, 1986
- Argued
- March 24, 1986
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Maine v. Taylor et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1985-121, docket 1985-121-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityLaw held unconstitutional
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corporation of America
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas
- Healy v. the Beer InstituteAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc.
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State Department of RevenueAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. ScheinerLaw held unconstitutional
- D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd. v. McNamara
- New Energy Company of Indiana v. LimbachLaw held unconstitutional
- Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.
- Cleavinger v. Saxner
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
- Fisher v. City of Berkeley
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD v. Zenith Radio Corp.
- Dennison Manufacturing Co. v. Panduit Corp.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error