Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court of California
480 U.S. 102 · Decided February 24, 1987 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court of California was decided on February 24, 1987 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 480 U.S. 102 · 107 S. Ct. 1026 · 94 L. Ed. 2d 92 · 1987 U.S. LEXIS 555
- Docket number
- 85-693
- Decided
- February 24, 1987
- Argued
- November 5, 1986
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority |
Full case caption
Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court of California, Solano County (Cheng Shin Rubber Industrial Co., Ltd., Real Party in Interest)
SCDB identifiers: case 1986-037, docket 1986-037-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents”
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd.
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk
- Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman
- Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts
- Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
- Martin v. Ohio
- Colorado v. Connelly
- Board of Pardons v. Allen
- Rock v. Arkansas
- Rivera v. Minnich
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Martin v. Ohio
- Federal Communications Commission v. Florida Power Corp.
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. Debenedictis
- United States v. Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma
- Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.
- Hodel v. IrvingLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error