Due Process cases at the Supreme Court
Cases that turn on due process guarantees: notice and hearing requirements, rights of prisoners and defendants outside criminal-procedure categories, impartial decision makers, jurisdiction over nonresidents, and takings.
363decisions
68%favorable to the petitioner
39%unanimous
57altered precedent or struck a law
Issues in this area
Number of decisions SCDB assigns to each specific issue. Issues with at least 5 decisions have their own page.
Decisions by decade
Most majority opinions
Decisions that altered precedent or struck down a law (54)
- Tyler v. Hennepin CountyLaw held unconstitutional
- Pakdel v. City and County of San FranciscoLaw held unconstitutional
- Cedar Point Nursery v. HassidLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. DavisLaw held unconstitutional
- Knick v. Township of ScottAltered precedent
- Sessions v. DimayaLaw held unconstitutional
- Pavan v. SmithLaw held unconstitutional
- Nelson v. ColoradoLaw held unconstitutional
- Johnson v. United StatesAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Obergefell v. HodgesAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Horne v. Department of AgricultureLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. WindsorLaw held unconstitutional
- Gary Kent Jones v. Linda K. FlowersLaw held unconstitutional
- City of Chicago v. Jesus MoralesLaw held unconstitutional
- Eastern Enterprises v. Kenneth S. ApfelLaw held unconstitutional
- Bruce Babbitt v. Marvin K. Youpee, Sr.Law held unconstitutional
- Samuel A. Lewis v. Fletcher Casey, Jr.Altered precedent
- Byron Keith Cooper v. OklahomaLaw held unconstitutional
- Terry Foucha v. LouisianaLaw held unconstitutional
- Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Joanne PopeLaw held unconstitutional
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los AngelesLaw held unconstitutional
- Hodel v. IrvingLaw held unconstitutional
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsLaw held unconstitutional
- Kolender v. LawsonLaw held unconstitutional
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp.Law held unconstitutional
- Greene v. LindseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithLaw held unconstitutional
- Vitek v. JonesLaw held unconstitutional
- Barry v. BarchiLaw held unconstitutional
- Shaffer v. HeitnerAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Connally v. GeorgiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Mullaney v. WilburLaw held unconstitutional
- Goss v. LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- Vlandis v. KlineLaw held unconstitutional
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleLaw held unconstitutional
- Robinson v. HanrahanLaw held unconstitutional
- Jackson v. IndianaLaw held unconstitutional
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleLaw held unconstitutional
- Bell v. BursonLaw held unconstitutional
Most recent decisions
- Pung v. Isabella County
- Gutierrez v. Saenz
- Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization
- Glossip v. Oklahoma
- Culley v. Marshall
- Devillier v. Texas
- Sheetz v. County of El Dorado
- Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
- Tyler v. Hennepin CountyLaw held unconstitutional
- Penneast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey
- Pakdel v. City and County of San FranciscoLaw held unconstitutional
- Lombardo v. St. Louis
- Cedar Point Nursery v. HassidLaw held unconstitutional
- Ford Motor Company v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court
- Kahler v. Kansas
- United States v. DavisLaw held unconstitutional
- Knick v. Township of ScottAltered precedent
- Timbs v. Indiana
- Sessions v. DimayaLaw held unconstitutional
- Pavan v. SmithLaw held unconstitutional
- Murr v. Wisconsin
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca.
- BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell
- Nelson v. ColoradoLaw held unconstitutional
- Michael Damon Rippo v. Renee Baker
- Williams v. Pennsylvania
- Johnson v. United StatesAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Obergefell v. HodgesAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Horne v. Department of AgricultureLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Clarke
Search all 363 Due Process decisions
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error