Due process, hearing or notice: Supreme Court decisions
Every U.S. Supreme Court decision from the 1946 through 2025 Terms that the Supreme Court Database classifies under the issue “Due process, hearing or notice,” part of the Due Process area.
61decisions
72%favorable to the petitioner
41%unanimous
15altered precedent or struck a law
Decisions by decade
Most majority opinions
Legal provisions most often involved
All 61 decisions, newest first
- Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
- Sessions v. DimayaLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Clarke
- Gary Kent Jones v. Linda K. FlowersLaw held unconstitutional
- Yaser Esam Hamdi and Esam Fouad Hamdi as Next Friend of Yaser Esam Hamdi v. Donald H. Rumsfeld
- City of Los Angeles v. Edwin F. David
- Larry Dean Dusenbery v. United States
- Wilbert K. Rogers v. Tennessee
- Arthur S. Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
- Donald E. Nelson v. Adams
- City of West Covina v. Lawrence Perkins
- Jason Richards v. Jefferson County
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mallen
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Joanne PopeLaw held unconstitutional
- R. 'roy' Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.
- Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing
- Illinois v. Batchelder
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsLaw held unconstitutional
- Greene v. LindseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
- O'Bannon v. Town Court Nursing Center
- Mackey v. Montrym
- Barry v. BarchiLaw held unconstitutional
- Leis v. Flynt
- New Motor Vehicle Board of California v. Orrin W. Fox Co.
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz
- Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform
- Dixon v. Love
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shapiro et Ux.
- Laing v. United States
- Goss v. LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
- Dillard v. Industrial Commission of Virginia
- Jennings v. Mahoney
- Bell v. BursonLaw held unconstitutional
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauLaw held unconstitutional
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of the City of Durham
- Westbrook v. Arizona
- Pate v. Robinson
- Armstrong v. Manzo et Ux.
- Willner v. Committee on Character and FitnessLaw held unconstitutional
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkLaw held unconstitutional
- In re Green
- Oyler v. Boles
- Dusky v. United States
- Sublett v. Adams
- Lambert v. CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonLaw held unconstitutional
- Covey v. Town of SomersLaw held unconstitutional
- Shaughnessy v. United States ex Rel. Mezei
- Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding
- City of New York v. New York
- Whelchel v. McDonald
- Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Law held unconstitutional
- Williams v. New York
- Federal Communications Commission v. WJR
- Taylor v. Alabama
- Paterno v. Lyons
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error