United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property
510 U.S. 43 · Decided December 13, 1993 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property was decided on December 13, 1993 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part, reversed or vacated it in part, and remanded the case. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, hearing or notice” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 510 U.S. 43 · 114 S. Ct. 492 · 126 L. Ed. 2d 490 · 1993 U.S. LEXIS 7941
- Docket number
- 92-1180
- Decided
- December 13, 1993
- Argued
- October 6, 1993
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- Harry A. Blackmun
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, hearing or notice
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1993-007, docket 1993-007-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, hearing or notice”
- Jason Richards v. Jefferson County
- City of West Covina v. Lawrence Perkins
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mallen
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Joanne PopeLaw held unconstitutional
- R. 'roy' Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.
- Donald E. Nelson v. Adams
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (due process)
- Janet Reno v. Jenny Lisette Flores
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinAltered precedent
- Diane Griffin v. United States
- Janice R. Lachance v. Lester E. Erickson, Jr.
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.
- Texas v. McCullough
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error