Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform
431 U.S. 816 · Decided June 13, 1977 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform was decided on June 13, 1977 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, hearing or notice” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 431 U.S. 816 · 97 S. Ct. 2094 · 53 L. Ed. 2d 14 · 1977 U.S. LEXIS 108
- Docket number
- 76-180
- Decided
- June 13, 1977
- Argued
- March 21, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, hearing or notice
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Special concurrence | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Smith, Administrator, New York City Human Resources Administration, et al. v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1976-131, docket 1976-131-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, hearing or notice”
- Dixon v. Love
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shapiro et Ux.
- Laing v. United States
- New Motor Vehicle Board of California v. Orrin W. Fox Co.
- Leis v. Flynt
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Manson v. Brathwaite
- Carey v. Population Services InternationalLaw held unconstitutional
- Patterson v. New York
- Shaffer v. HeitnerAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandLaw held unconstitutional
- Henderson v. Kibbe
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Moody v. Daggett
- Connally v. GeorgiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Codd v. Velger
- Bounds v. Smith
- Dixon v. Love
- Patterson v. New York
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error