CaseTrail

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca.

137 S. Ct. 1773 · Decided June 19, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca. was decided on June 19, 2017 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents” in the Due Process area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
137 S. Ct. 1773 · 198 L. Ed. 2d 395 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3873
Docket number
16-466
Decided
June 19, 2017
Argued
April 25, 2017
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–1
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Due Process
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca.

SCDB identifiers: case 2016-072, docket 2016-072-01.

Other cases on “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Due Process)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error