CaseTrail

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Edgar D. Brown

564 U.S. 915 · Decided June 27, 2011 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Edgar D. Brown was decided on June 27, 2011 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents” in the Due Process area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
564 U.S. 915 · 131 S. Ct. 2846 · 180 L. Ed. 2d 796 · 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4801
Docket number
10-76
Decided
June 27, 2011
Argued
January 11, 2011
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Due Process
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A., et Al., Petitioners v. Edgar D. Brown, et Ux., Co-Administrators of the Estate of Julian David Brown, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2010-081, docket 2010-081-01.

Other cases on “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Due Process)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error