BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell
137 S. Ct. 1549 · Decided May 30, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell was decided on May 30, 2017 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2016
Case details
- Citations
- 137 S. Ct. 1549 · 198 L. Ed. 2d 36 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3395
- Docket number
- 16-405
- Decided
- May 30, 2017
- Argued
- April 25, 2017
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority |
Full case caption
BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell
SCDB identifiers: case 2016-073, docket 2016-073-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents”
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca.
- Walden v. Fiore
- Daimlerchrysler Ag v. Bauman
- Ford Motor Company v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Edgar D. Brown
- J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Robert Nicastro
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Nelson v. ColoradoLaw held unconstitutional
- Michael Damon Rippo v. Renee Baker
- Whole Woman's Health v. HellerstedtLaw held unconstitutional
- Williams v. Pennsylvania
- Shawn Patrick Lynch v. Arizona
- Wearry v. Cain
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Michael Damon Rippo v. Renee Baker
- Nelson v. ColoradoLaw held unconstitutional
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca.
- Murr v. Wisconsin
- Pavan v. SmithLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error