CaseTrail

BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell

137 S. Ct. 1549 · Decided May 30, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell was decided on May 30, 2017 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents” in the Due Process area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
137 S. Ct. 1549 · 198 L. Ed. 2d 36 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3395
Docket number
16-405
Decided
May 30, 2017
Argued
April 25, 2017
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–1
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Due Process
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell

SCDB identifiers: case 2016-073, docket 2016-073-01.

Other cases on “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Due Process)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error