CaseTrail

Atchison v. Public Utilities Commission of California

346 U.S. 346 · Decided November 9, 1953 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Atchison v. Public Utilities Commission of California was decided on November 9, 1953 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Sherman Minton wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
346 U.S. 346 · 74 S. Ct. 92 · 98 L. Ed. 2d 51 · 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1550
Docket number
22
Decided
November 9, 1953
Argued
October 14, 1953
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Sherman Minton
Opinion assigned by
Hugo L. Black
How the case arrived
Appeal
Issue area
Due Process
Legal provision
Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Earl Warren.

Full case caption

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of California et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1953-006, docket 1953-006-01.

Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (takings clause)

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error