Barnard v. Thorstenn
489 U.S. 546 · Decided March 6, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Barnard v. Thorstenn was decided on March 6, 1989 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Residency requirements” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 489 U.S. 546 · 109 S. Ct. 1294 · 103 L. Ed. 2d 559 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1241
- Docket number
- 87-1939
- Decided
- March 6, 1989
- Argued
- January 11, 1989
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Residency requirements
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (privileges and immunities clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Barnard, Chairman of the Committee of Bar Examiners of the Virgin Islands v. Thorstenn et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1988-051, docket 1988-051-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Residency requirements”
- Supreme Court of Virginia v. FriedmanLaw held unconstitutional
- Frazier v. Heebe
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- Hooper v. Bernalillo County AssessorLaw held unconstitutional
- Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. PiperLaw held unconstitutional
- United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity v. Mayor and Council of the City of Camden
Cases on the same legal provision: Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (privileges and immunities clause)
- Jones v. Helms
- Christopher H. Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals TribunalLaw held unconstitutional
- Austin v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- New York v. O'Neill
- Mullaney v. AndersonLaw held unconstitutional
- Missouri ex Rel. Southern Railway Co. v. Mayfield
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Town of Huntington v. Huntington Branch
- Penson v. Ohio
- Pittston Coal Group v. Sebben
- Owens v. Okure
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson CompanyLaw held unconstitutional
- In re McDonald
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error