Hooper v. Bernalillo County Assessor
472 U.S. 612 · Decided June 24, 1985 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Hooper v. Bernalillo County Assessor was decided on June 24, 1985 by a vote of 5–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Residency requirements” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 472 U.S. 612 · 105 S. Ct. 2862 · 86 L. Ed. 2d 487 · 1985 U.S. LEXIS 97
- Docket number
- 84-231
- Decided
- June 24, 1985
- Argued
- February 20, 1985
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Residency requirements
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr..
Full case caption
Hooper et al. v. Bernalillo County Assessor
SCDB identifiers: case 1984-136, docket 1984-136-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Residency requirements”
- Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. PiperLaw held unconstitutional
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity v. Mayor and Council of the City of Camden
- Frazier v. Heebe
- Martinez v. Bynum
- Supreme Court of Virginia v. FriedmanLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Williams v. VermontLaw held unconstitutional
- Hunter v. UnderwoodLaw held unconstitutional
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. WardLaw held unconstitutional
- Batson v. KentuckyAltered precedent
- Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston
- Alexander v. Choate
- Brandon v. Holt
- United States v. Dann
- Ake v. Oklahoma
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Hampton County Election Commission
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error