Blow v. North Carolina
379 U.S. 684 · Decided February 1, 1965 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Blow v. North Carolina was decided on February 1, 1965 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sit-in demonstrations against racial discrimination” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 379 U.S. 684 · 85 S. Ct. 635 · 13 L. Ed. 2d 603 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1895
- Docket number
- 387
- Decided
- February 1, 1965
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title II)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority |
Full case caption
Blow et al. v. North Carolina
SCDB identifiers: case 1964-041, docket 1964-041-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sit-in demonstrations against racial discrimination”
- Hamm v. City of Rock Hill
- Abernathy v. Alabama.
- McKinnie v. Tennessee
- Parrot v. City of Tallahassee
- Walker v. Georgia
- Drews v. Maryland
Cases on the same legal provision: Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title II)
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.
- United States v. Johnson
- Daniel v. Paul
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Scranton v. Drew
- McLaughlin v. FloridaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Hamm v. City of Rock Hill
- Parsons v. Buckley
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error